PERFUSION REPORTS

REPORT
031
DATE
TITLE
High Transmembrane Pressure Gradients
DETAILS OF INCIDENT

During a 3 day period this unit experienced 2 incidents of abnormally high trans-membrane pressure gradients (TMP) during the early stages of cardiopulmonary bypass. The department routinely utilises roller pumps for bypass and measures pre- and post-membrane pressures for all cases. Abnormal gradients are defined within the unit as P >300mmHg, with attention to related factors e.g. flow etc. Consideration for oxygenator change out is only made when perfusion becomes limited and potentially inadequate. For the cases there were no observed common factors e.g. surgeon or perfusion scientist; however the same oxygenator model (Sorin Inspire 6F) was utilised but each had a different batch number.


  • Case 1: The patient was an average sized 18 year old male scheduled for redo sternotomy for an aortic root replacement having previously undergone a valvotomy in childhood. After sternotomy and heparinisation, a small bleed occurred requiring quicker than expected bypass initiation however a longer than adequate ACT had already been achieved. Initially full flow was reached, with a normal TMP 150mmHg. Cooling to 30C was commenced. More dissection of the heart was required for mobilisation and therefore the aortic cross clamp was not applied. After about 20mins on bypass the TMP gradually increased to >300mmHg. The circuit was checked for physical obstructions, a second perfusion scientist was consulted, the surgeon was informed and the case perfusion scientist requested to rewarm the patient hoping this may resolve the situation. The pressure however continued to rise, the pre-membrane pressure reaching in excess of 600mmHg (TMP>450mmHg). After discussion, and as the bleeding issue had been resolved but knowing a prolonged bypass was expected the decision was made to come off bypass and change the oxygenator. The patient was ventilated, filled and normal ejection was established for change out. This occurred without any untoward event, bypass was re-established, and normal pressures were observed and maintained for the duration of the case. The patient was weaned successfully and underwent an uneventful post-op course. There was no observed effect to the patient from this event.


  • Case 2: A 66year old unremarkable male was scheduled for a primary mitral valve repair. Bypass was initiated after an ACT=541 and the patient cooled to 34C according to specific surgeon request, TMP 200mmHg. After about 30mins on bypass and the application of the aortic cross clamp and opening of the heart chamber increasing TMP was noted, again the circuit was checked for obstruction or error and another Perfusion Scientists opinion requested. The pre-membrane pressure continued to rise to >600mmHg , TMP>400mmHg. The situation was discussed with the surgeon and as the heart was open cooling of the patient commenced. The TMP increased to >500mmHg despite reducing arterial flow (and therefore ABP) and the decision was made to replace the oxygenator. Change out occurred at 31C, CPB was interrupted for 1.5 minutes and re-established without incident. Normal pressures returned and the bypass, weaning and post-op period occurred uneventfully. No negative effects were observed in the patient, neurological or otherwise. 

DETAILS OF INJURY TO PATIENT

None

TYPE OF DEVICE/MANUFACTURER

N/A

ACTION TAKEN

In both cases the oxygenators were preserved and returned to the manufacturer for analysis.

The findings are outlined below:

 DHR verification did not reveal any relevant information possibly linked with the claimed event.
 Significant haematic deposits were found in both oxygenator and heat exchanger fibre mats.
 This is classified as a rare event, with a 0.03% global complaint rate in 2015.
Most likely the root cause of the issue is multi-factorial, where a combination of triggering factors might be originating the phenomena including interaction with clinical procedure and patient. 
A number of activities are on-going to identify the possible root causes of the issue
Internal R&D, QA and marketing resources together with Consultants from national and international Universities are working on the matter.



The department has reviewed its protocols for dealing with these cases after an extensive review of the relevant literature; however each case needs to be assessed relative to its immediate situation. The decision whether to change out an oxygenator lies with the case perfusion scientist following discussion with the Consultant Surgeon and Anaesthetist.

RESPONSE FROM MANUFACTURER

N/A

ADDTIONAL INFORMATION

N/A

SUPPORTING VISUALS/VIDEO

N/A

SUPPORTING DOCUMENT

OTHER PERFUSION
 REPORTS

London Core Review Cardiothoracic Surgery Course - Touch icon
London Core Review Cardiothoracic Surgery Course - Help Guide
Select and scroll to view chosen report
REPORT NO
089
1/9/21
Sechrist Gas Blender Sweep on ECMO
REPORT NO
088
1/9/21
Oxygenator High Pressure Events
REPORT NO
087
1/10/21
Leaking one way valve
REPORT NO
086
1/7/21
Electronic Gas Blender Fault
REPORT NO
085
1/2/21
Protamine Administration Issue
REPORT NO
084
1/6/21
Damaged roller pump lid
REPORT NO
083
1/6/21
IABP malfunction
REPORT NO
082
1/1/21
Accidental cardioplegia administration
REPORT NO
081
1/4/21
S5 Double Roller Pump incident
REPORT NO
080
1/5/21
Human factors issue
REPORT NO
079
1/6/21
Centrimag battery module failure
REPORT NO
078
1/6/21
Sampling manifold valve fault
REPORT NO
077
1/5/21
IABP transport issue
REPORT NO
076
1/4/21
Modified Ultrafiltration (MUF) Issue
REPORT NO
075
1/3/21
Electromagnetic interference with HLM
REPORT NO
074
1/2/21
HCU40 Failure
REPORT NO
073
1/2/21
HCU40 valve failures
REPORT NO
072
1/1/21
HCU40 failure
REPORT NO
071
1/1/21
LIVA NOVA STATEMENT ON CENTRIFUGAL HEAD
REPORT NO
070
1/1/21
Loose component on circuit
REPORT NO
069
1/12/20
Centrifugal Head noise
REPORT NO
068
1/11/20
Venous Reservoir disposable issue
REPORT NO
067
1/11/20
Failure of Heater Cooler due to leaking valves
REPORT NO
066
1/11/20
Failure of Valves on heater cooler unit
REPORT NO
065
1/9/20
Intra Aortic Balloon Pump (IABP) Failure
REPORT NO
064
1/9/20
Centrifugal head failure
REPORT NO
063
1/8/20
Centrifugal head issue 4
REPORT NO
062
1/8/20
Human Factors Issue
REPORT NO
061
1/8/20
LIVA NOVA RESPONSE TO REPORTED CENTRIFUGAL HEAD ISSUE
REPORT NO
060
1/8/20
Oxygenator Fibre Leak
Perfusion Report cards are shown in batches of 30 at any one time where available.
120
119
118
117
116
115
114
112
111
110
109
108
107
106
105
104
103
102
101
100
099
098
097
096
095
094
093
092
091
090
089
088
087
086
085
084
083
082
081
080
079
078
077
076
075
074
073
072
071
070
069
068
067
066
065
064
063
062
061
060
059
058
057
056
055
054
053
052
051
050
049
048
047
046
045
044
043
042
041
040
039
038
037
036
035
034
033
032
031
030
029
028
027
026
025
024
023
022
021
020
London Core Review Cardiothoracic Surgery Course - Touch icon
London Core Review Cardiothoracic Surgery Course - Help Guide
Know the report number? Scroll horizontally through the circle icons and select to view the appropriate report.