PERFUSION REPORTS

REPORT
113
DATE
21/3/2023
TITLE
ERC Failure
DETAILS OF INCIDENT

A patient was undergoing elective cardiac surgery at the Sussex Cardiac Centre which required cardiopulmonary (heart lung) bypass.

The surgery and bypass proceeded uneventfully until towardsthe end of the operation, when as it came time to stop bypass, an equipmentmalfunction meant that the patient’s blood flow failed to re-establish.

A team of perfusionists worked to identify the cause, and blood flow was reestablished after 11 minutes, and the procedure was completed. 

The patient later died following confirmed hypoxic-ischaemic brain injury.

Summary of findings and     learning

  • A suspected malfunction of the electronic remote clamp is considered to have occurred causing it to have activated in error and leading to unrecognised obstructed blood flow. This was shared with the manufacturer for investigation.
  • Cognitive bias resulted in task focus on the control panel as the cause of the issue. This led to     a delay in the identification of the arterial clamp failure as the cause.

There is no specificnational or local standard operating procedure/protocol for the action to takein the event of forward flow failure

DETAILS OF INJURY TO PATIENT

The patient passed away and the case was referred to the Coroner which was concluded in 2024.

TYPE OF DEVICE/MANUFACTURER

Stockert S5 ERC.

ACTION TAKEN

Summary of findings and     learning

  • A suspected malfunction of the electronic remote clamp is considered to have occurred causing it to have activated in error and leading to unrecognised obstructed blood flow. This was shared with the manufacturer for investigation.
  • Cognitive bias resulted in task focus on the control panel as the cause of the issue. This led to a delay in the identification of the arterial clamp failure as the cause.
  • There is no specificnation or local standard operating procedure/protocol for the action to takein the event of forward flow failure

Recommendations

  • Report the incident and findings to the Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA)
  • Develop and implement a protocol for the management of the failure of forward flow due to obstruction.
  • Simulation and humanfactors-oriented training as a wider multidisciplinary team to be undertaken.

RESPONSE FROM MANUFACTURER

Complaint Number: 2023-01678 Hospital:

Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust

Brighton Event Occurred Summary On 21 March 2023,

LivaNova received a report of an incident involving a LivaNova medical device at Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust. The reporting hospital stated that on the same day multiple alarms occurred on HLM S5 perfusion system during a procedure and blood circulation was stopped for approximately 14 minutes. The patient passed away 10 days later.

Brighton and Sussex hospital perfusion circuit The Hospital used a CP5 centrifugal pump and LivaNova understands that the setup included the flowmeter between the CP5 centrifugal pump and the oxygenator with the bubble sensor located in the arterial line before the ERC clamp.

Technical Service Assistance Following notification of the incident, a LivaNova field service engineer was dispatched to the hospital. The CP5 and the ERC were inspected without finding any deviations. As a precaution, the ERC clamp and CP5 panel were replaced and removed for further investigation by LivaNova. In addition, the pump drive, flow module and sensor were also retained by LivaNova. LivaNova's complaints database indicates that since its installation in 2011, no other issues have been submitted for the ERC clamp (SN:60S16179).

Two different log files were recovered and analysed: - CP5 log file: this log stores only technical error messages related to the CP5 centrifugal pump system and the ERC if connected. - Connect Serdat file: this log records all clinical events (e.g. flow values, bubble, pressure, level alarms, clamp status) Connect receives from its interface.

In summary, the log files indicate that the ERC clamp functioned as expected until 11:41:28 when, after the level alarm cleared, the clamp didn’t open automatically as expected. The ERC timeout was registered in the CP5 Log file and the ERC would no longer have been operable using the electronic control panel and would have required manual intervention in accordance with the IFU.

Inspection of the removed CP5 control panel, pump drive, flow module and sensor did not reveal any functional issue with the returned parts. ERC visual inspection The ERC clamp was opened revealing signs of corrosion. It was surmised that this was likely due to wear and fluid penetration over its lifetime.

Conclusion

Event reported to LivaNova on 21 March 2023 was related to bypass procedure stopped for about 14 minutes, during when no blood flow was possible. During the event of 21 March 2023, multiple alarms were triggered and recorded by the HLM S5 perfusion system, the first was related to an issue opening the ERC clamp. This was properly identified by the HLM S5 perfusion system which displayed the “Arterial clamp is defective” message on the system panel. Due to the multiple alarms, and lack of scrolling in accordance with the IFU, this error was only recognized by the user after a period of delay. Analysis of the available diagnostic real-time data confirms that the ERC became inoperably when in the closed position which may have led to the other alarms being triggered by the system. Analysis of post-market data has not identified any similar event occurring worldwide during more than 5 million performed procedures. The investigation has determined that the root cause of the ERC becoming inoperable was reduced performance of lubricant in the ERC Clamp motor related to wearing as consequence of age and apparent liquid penetration.

ADDTIONAL INFORMATION

The Safety Committee commend the openness and transparency that was shown by Brighton and Sussex hospital. They demonstrated an open and just culture to ensure that essential learning and improvements in safety can be made within the perfusion profession. As a profession it is essentil that we learn from these incidents and share the knowledge to improve practice. Of note there has been no safety reports listed to the safety committee outlining ERC failure, although it is unlikely that this has not occured.

 

SUPPORTING VISUALS/VIDEO
SUPPORTING DOCUMENT

OTHER PERFUSION
 REPORTS

London Core Review Cardiothoracic Surgery Course - Touch icon
London Core Review Cardiothoracic Surgery Course - Help Guide
Select and scroll to view chosen report
REPORT NO
095
1/1/22
Protamine Administration
REPORT NO
094
1/11/21
Oxygenation failure upon commencement of CPB
REPORT NO
093
1/11/21
Detached bullet tip of sump-updated response Sep 2022
REPORT NO
092
1/10/21
Vapourizer Issue
REPORT NO
091
1/10/21
Oyxgenator Leak
REPORT NO
090
1/10/21
Breach of chemical cleaner
REPORT NO
089
1/9/21
Sechrist Gas Blender Sweep on ECMO
REPORT NO
088
1/9/21
Oxygenator High Pressure Events
REPORT NO
087
1/10/21
Leaking one way valve
REPORT NO
086
1/7/21
Electronic Gas Blender Fault
REPORT NO
085
1/2/21
Protamine Administration Issue
REPORT NO
084
1/6/21
Damaged roller pump lid
REPORT NO
083
1/6/21
IABP malfunction
REPORT NO
082
1/1/21
Accidental cardioplegia administration
REPORT NO
081
1/4/21
S5 Double Roller Pump incident
REPORT NO
080
1/5/21
Human factors issue
REPORT NO
079
1/6/21
Centrimag battery module failure
REPORT NO
078
1/6/21
Sampling manifold valve fault
REPORT NO
077
1/5/21
IABP transport issue
REPORT NO
076
1/4/21
Modified Ultrafiltration (MUF) Issue
REPORT NO
075
1/3/21
Electromagnetic interference with HLM
REPORT NO
074
1/2/21
HCU40 Failure
REPORT NO
073
1/2/21
HCU40 valve failures
REPORT NO
072
1/1/21
HCU40 failure
REPORT NO
071
1/1/21
LIVA NOVA STATEMENT ON CENTRIFUGAL HEAD
REPORT NO
070
1/1/21
Loose component on circuit
REPORT NO
069
1/12/20
Centrifugal Head noise
REPORT NO
068
1/11/20
Venous Reservoir disposable issue
REPORT NO
067
1/11/20
Failure of Heater Cooler due to leaking valves
REPORT NO
066
1/11/20
Failure of Valves on heater cooler unit
Perfusion Report cards are shown in batches of 30 at any one time where available.
124
123
123
122
121
120
119
118
117
116
115
114
113
112
111
110
109
108
107
106
105
104
103
102
101
100
099
098
097
096
095
094
093
092
091
090
089
088
087
086
085
084
083
082
081
080
079
078
077
076
075
074
073
072
071
070
069
068
067
066
065
064
063
062
061
060
059
058
057
056
055
054
053
052
051
050
049
048
047
046
045
044
043
042
041
040
039
038
037
036
035
034
033
032
031
030
029
028
027
026
London Core Review Cardiothoracic Surgery Course - Touch icon
London Core Review Cardiothoracic Surgery Course - Help Guide
Know the report number? Scroll horizontally through the circle icons and select to view the appropriate report.