PERFUSION REPORTS

REPORT
120
DATE
1/5/2024
TITLE
Disposable Incident
DETAILS OF INCIDENT

A 6 year-old boy presented for redo surgery with a sub aortic obstruction. He had previously undergone aortic surgery 4 years prior and the subsequent planned operation was either further relief within the sub-aortic region or possibly a Ross procedure.The patient was 19.5kg and 107cm with a BSA of 0.76m2 His calculated flow was 2lpm The chosen circuit consisted of a preconnected Liva Nova D101,3/8” venous line and 1/4” arterial line (departmental protocol describes this up to 2.5lpm). CDI venous and arterial inline monitoring were used.The patient was anaesthetised as per usual protocol. After a re-do sternotomy heparin was administered, and bypass was started initially with a single SVC cannula, reaching 2/3 of full flow. During this time ventilation was maintained. Following IVC cannulation full bypass was reached and the ventilation stopped. Cooling to 34°C was commenced. It was noted that the inline arterial pO2 was low, FiO2 was increased but 100%was required to produce an adequate pO2 i.e. >20kPa. Attempts to reduce the FiO2 to expected levels were unsuccessful. Venous oxygen saturations were adequate throughout. An arterial blood gas confirmed the inline readings. An inline oxygen gas analyser confirmed the oxygen content. An independent gas flow analyser confirmed the gas supply. The gas line and supply were checked for leaks. The isoflurane vaporiser was temporarily turned off. An emergency oxygen cylinder was attached to the oxygenator, good oxygenation occurred. The blender was attached to emergency oxygen and air cylinders but on reducing the FiO2 below 100% the pO2 again dropped to<10kPa. The blender was changed however the issue did not resolve. The aortic cross clamp had not been applied. Circuit pressures and ACTs were acceptable.

DETAILS OF INJURY TO PATIENT
TYPE OF DEVICE/MANUFACTURER
ACTION TAKEN

    Following  discussion with the surgeon and anaesthetist and due to the potential for a  prolonged bypass case the decision was made to change the oxygenator. The  patient was rewarmed. A new full circuit was set up and primed on another HLM  incorporating a preconnected Liva Nova Inspire 6 oxygenator 3/8” venous and  1/4” arterial line. Bypass was terminated in the usual manner and the new  circuit attached to the cannula. Full bypass was established and oxygenation  was good with FiO2 of 40-50%. The blood from the initial circuit  was added to the new circuit and filtered.
 
 The operation continued uneventfully, undergoing a sub-aortic resection. The  patient recovered well and went home on day 5.
 
 Following change out the anaesthetist commented that during intubation the  patient had higher than expected oxygen demands.
 
 Due to operational demands the oxygenator was not kept for investigation. It  was decided that the oxygenator, although rated to greater than the patients  expected need was not adequate to oxygenate with a good safety capability for  prolonged surgery. Whether the oxygenator was working at full capacity is  unknown. It is unusual for this oxygenator to require such a high FiO2  gas supply at the beginning of the operation even for larger patients.  

RESPONSE FROM MANUFACTURER

The incident was reported it to the company but unfortunately the Oxy could not be sent. They asked to take note of the lot number in case there were further instances, however, without the device nothing could be concluded.

The department did experience another incidence recently with the same oxy, and same size patient struggling after a longer period of time on bypass.

ADDTIONAL INFORMATION

The safety committee has reviewed the incident and commend the team on identifying the issue and applying appropriate corrective measures. When these measures showed that the Oxygenator was potentially to small for effective perfusion the decision was taken to change the circuit. This was done in a safe and effective manner with excellent team work and communication.

SUPPORTING VISUALS/VIDEO
SUPPORTING DOCUMENT

OTHER PERFUSION
 REPORTS

London Core Review Cardiothoracic Surgery Course - Touch icon
London Core Review Cardiothoracic Surgery Course - Help Guide
Select and scroll to view chosen report
REPORT NO
032
Sucker Placed In Raceway In Wrong Direction
REPORT NO
031
High Transmembrane Pressure Gradients
REPORT NO
030
Faulty Connector On ECMO Soft Shell Reservoir Bag
REPORT NO
029
Sorin Inspire 8F Blood Leak From Temperature Port
REPORT NO
028
Sorin Inspire 8F Oxygenator Detached From Holding Arm
REPORT NO
027
Paragon Oxygenator Gas Inlet Leak
REPORT NO
026
Maquet IABP Console Failure
REPORT NO
025
Sorin EOS Gas To Blood Leak Whilst Priming
REPORT NO
024
Chalice Paragon Midi Heat Exchanger Leak Whilst Priming
REPORT NO
023
Chalice Paragon Heat Exchanger Water To Blood Leak
REPORT NO
022
Vent Pump Boot Tubing Inserted In Wrong Way Round
REPORT NO
021
Paragon Oxygenator Heat Exchanger Leak
REPORT NO
020
S3 E62 Pump Error
REPORT NO
019
Medtronic Potential Oxygenator Leak
REPORT NO
018
Medos Heat Exchanger Leak
REPORT NO
017
Avant D903 Has A Dual Chamber Reservoir Leak
REPORT NO
016
Additional Sucker Incorrectly Placed In Raceway
REPORT NO
015
Large Perished Tear Observed On Tubing At Back Of Vaporiser
REPORT NO
014
Gas Blender Flow Control Immobilised
REPORT NO
013
Isoflurane Vaporiser Seal Leak Due To Malposition
REPORT NO
012
1/2/13
Hypercoagulable Disorder May Have Led To Oxygenator Failure
REPORT NO
011
1/1/13
LV Vent Placed In Raceway In Wrong Direction
REPORT NO
010
1/3/12
Sucker Placed In Raceway In Wrong Direction
REPORT NO
009
1/2/12
Similarity In Heparin And St Thomas Cardioplegia Ampules
REPORT NO
008
1/7/11
Aorta Remained Clamped Post CPB
REPORT NO
007
1/5/11
Deficiencies In The QC At Terumo Ann Arbor, USA.
REPORT NO
006
1/4/11
Awareness Of Suckers When Using Bio-Glues
REPORT NO
005
1/2/11
Patient Exsanguinated From Additional Venous Line Post CPB
REPORT NO
004
1/1/11
Possible Inaccuracies In Colloid Research
REPORT NO
003
1/2/10
Difficulties In Visualising Blender Reading
Perfusion Report cards are shown in batches of 30 at any one time where available.
123
122
121
120
119
118
117
116
115
114
112
111
110
109
108
107
106
105
104
103
102
101
100
099
098
097
096
095
094
093
092
091
090
089
088
087
086
085
084
083
082
081
080
079
078
077
076
075
074
073
072
071
070
069
068
067
066
065
064
063
062
061
060
059
058
057
056
055
054
053
052
051
050
049
048
047
046
045
044
043
042
041
040
039
038
037
036
035
034
033
032
031
030
029
028
027
026
025
024
023
London Core Review Cardiothoracic Surgery Course - Touch icon
London Core Review Cardiothoracic Surgery Course - Help Guide
Know the report number? Scroll horizontally through the circle icons and select to view the appropriate report.